- Derive the commutators
and
.
Now show that
, that is,
raises the
eigenvalue but does not change the
eigenvalue.
Answer
Since
commutes with both
and
,
We have the commutators. Now we apply them to a
.
So,
is also an eigenfunction of
with the same eigenvalue.
does not change
.
So,
raises the eigenvalue of
.
- Write the (normalized) state which is an eigenstate of
with eigenvalue
and also
an eigenstate of
with eigenvalue
in terms of the usual
.
Answer
An eigenvalue of
implies
.
We will need a linear combination of the
to get the eigenstate of
.
Since this is true for all
and
, each term must be zero.
The state is
The trivial solution that
is just a zero state, not normalizable to 1.
- Write the (normalized) state which is an eigenstate of
with eigenvalue
and also
an eigenstate of
with eigenvalue
in terms of the usual
.
- Calculate the commutators
and
.
- Derive the relation
.
- A particle is in a
state and is known to have angular momentum
in the
direction equal to
. That is
.
Since we know
,
must have the form
.
Find the coefficients
and
for
normalized.
- Calculate the following commutators:
,
,
.
- Prove that, if the Hamiltonian is symmetric under rotations,
then
.
- In 3 dimensions, a particle is in the state:
where
is some arbitrary radial wave function normalized such that
- a)
- Find the value of C that will normalize this wave function.
- b)
- If a measurement of
is made, what are the possible measured
values and what are probabilities for each.
- c)
- Find the expected value of
in the above state.
- Two (different) atoms of masses
and
are bound
together into the ground state of a diatomic molecule.
The binding is such that radial excitations can be neglected
at low energy and that the atoms can be assumed to be a constant
distance
apart. (We will ignore the small spread around
.)
- a)
- What is the energy spectrum due to rotations of the molecule?
- b)
- Assuming that
is given, write down the energy
eigenfunctions for the ground state and the first excited state.
- c)
- Assuming that both masses are about 1000 MeV,
how does the excitation energy of the first excited state
compare to thermal energies at
K.
Jim Branson
2013-04-22