- Derive the commutators and .
Now show that
, that is,
raises the eigenvalue but does not change the eigenvalue.
Answer
Since commutes with both and ,
We have the commutators. Now we apply them to a .
So, is also an eigenfunction of with the same eigenvalue.
does not change .
So, raises the eigenvalue of .
- Write the (normalized) state which is an eigenstate of
with eigenvalue
and also
an eigenstate of with eigenvalue in terms of the usual .
Answer
An eigenvalue of
implies .
We will need a linear combination of the to get the eigenstate of
.
Since this is true for all and , each term must be zero.
The state is
The trivial solution that is just a zero state, not normalizable to 1.
- Write the (normalized) state which is an eigenstate of
with eigenvalue
and also
an eigenstate of with eigenvalue in terms of the usual .
- Calculate the commutators and .
- Derive the relation
.
- A particle is in a state and is known to have angular momentum
in the direction equal to . That is
.
Since we know , must have the form
.
Find the coefficients and for normalized.
- Calculate the following commutators: , ,
.
- Prove that, if the Hamiltonian is symmetric under rotations,
then .
- In 3 dimensions, a particle is in the state:
where is some arbitrary radial wave function normalized such that
- a)
- Find the value of C that will normalize this wave function.
- b)
- If a measurement of is made, what are the possible measured
values and what are probabilities for each.
- c)
- Find the expected value of in the above state.
- Two (different) atoms of masses and are bound
together into the ground state of a diatomic molecule.
The binding is such that radial excitations can be neglected
at low energy and that the atoms can be assumed to be a constant
distance apart. (We will ignore the small spread around .)
- a)
- What is the energy spectrum due to rotations of the molecule?
- b)
- Assuming that is given, write down the energy
eigenfunctions for the ground state and the first excited state.
- c)
- Assuming that both masses are about 1000 MeV,
how does the excitation energy of the first excited state
compare to thermal energies at K.
Jim Branson
2013-04-22